For individual users
SIA Workspace
A conversational interface for people who want a familiar AI experience with SIA built into every interaction.
Product preview
SIA governs prompts, reduces unnecessary token use, and monitors outcome quality. It also preserves Agent Authority and creates reviewable evidence through each interface.
One interaction. Complete decision trace.
Managed prompt
Checked outcome
Authority
Control begins before the model call and continues through the outcome.
SIA keeps prompt context, quality findings, authority, and evidence visible.
Without SIA / With SIA
Three authored examples that illustrate the pattern. Figures shown for each example are illustrative, not measured benchmark results.
Choose an example to compare
These are authored examples that illustrate the pattern: a governed answer that is shorter while still covering the task’s requirements. They are not recorded benchmark results, and the figures shown for each example are illustrative. Aggregate benchmark numbers appear in the estimator below.
Software engineering · Coding
The prompt, as sent
Fix the CSV parsing bug in the attached parse_row function: quoted fields that contain a comma are split into the wrong number of columns. Return the minimal corrected code, explain the cause in a sentence or two, and confirm the quoted-comma case now parses correctly. Use only the attached source.
Tokens on this call
−23.3%
600 → 460
Cost of this call
−46.0%
generation model only
Quality (illustrative)
80 → 90
+10 points
What the prompt demanded
5 of 5
ungoverned met 3 · +2
Without SIA
320 output tokens
The problem is that the current parse_row function uses line.split(","), which treats every comma as a field separator. When a value is wrapped in quotes and itself contains a comma, for example "Smith, Ana", the function incorrectly breaks it into two fields. This is a classic CSV parsing mistake. To fix it properly, you should stop splitting the string by hand and use Python's built-in csv module, which already implements the CSV format rules for you, including quoted fields: ```python import csv from io import StringIO def parse_row(line): reader = csv.reader(StringIO(line)) return next(reader) ``` Explanation: - Cause: split(",") has no concept of quoting, so any comma inside a quoted value is treated as a delimiter. - Fix: csv.reader understands quoting and returns the fields exactly as intended. - Why it works: wrapping the line in StringIO lets csv.reader read it like a small file, so "Smith, Ana" is kept as a single field. This is the smallest change that resolves the issue while keeping the function's signature and behavior for ordinary rows unchanged.
With SIA
110 output tokens · same prompt, governed
```python def parse_row(line): import csv from io import StringIO return next(csv.reader(StringIO(line))) ``` Cause: `split(",")` has no concept of quoting, so a comma inside a quoted value is treated as a field separator (violates RFC 4180 §2.6). Check: `parse_row('42,"Smith, Ana",active')` now returns `["42", "Smith, Ana", "active"]`, so the quoted-comma case parses correctly.
The governed answer is shorter, yet it still covers every requirement the task called for. Representative requirements are shown below.
Built from the SIA-500 benchmark suite, not from the illustrative examples above. Choose an assumed reduction and this applies it to public list prices and the volume you set. The default is deliberately conservative.
Model
Calls per month
Assumed output-token reduction
GPT-4o today · per year
$1,110
With SIA · per year
$999.00
Difference
$111.00
How this is worked out. A 10% output-token reduction (conservative assumption), applied to a call of 900 tokens in and 700 out, priced at OpenAI’s published rates of $2.50 and $10.00 per million tokens (as at 2026-05-25).
SIA-500 token results. Median output-token reduction: 8.9%. Arithmetic mean (per-prompt): approximately 30%. The gap between median and mean reflects task-to-task variation, so results should be read as a distribution rather than a guaranteed per-request reduction.
Illustrative estimate only. Actual results vary by task, model, workload, and deployment configuration. It assumes cost falls in proportion to tokens, covers the OpenAI model only, and does not represent total deployment cost or net SIA processing overhead.
These are our prompts. Yours are the ones that matter.
A pilot runs the same comparison on twenty of your own prompts and returns the findings, the measured token difference, and a record you can take to your own review.
Choose your interface
These are different ways to use SIA, not separate capability packages. Each interface provides access to the same SIA platform.
For individual users
A conversational interface for people who want a familiar AI experience with SIA built into every interaction.
For existing AI tools
Prompt guidance and SIA controls inside the interfaces employees already use.
For applications and developers
The same SIA functions available through programmed integrations, enterprise applications, and agent workflows.
One semantic alignment platform
Every interface is designed to provide access to the same SIA capabilities as it becomes available.
Guided evidence workspace
This illustrative preview uses synthetic data. No prompt is evaluated and no external action is executed.
What the user sees
1. Prompt sent
The person works in the interface they already use.
2. Response returned
When checks pass, the workflow is not interrupted.
What SIA records independently
Choose a scenario, select a finding, and open the Review and Report views to see the complete governance record.
Customer policy summary
Objective
Human task
Prompt management
Context refined
AI result
Observed
Outcome and authority check
Quality and authority
Human decision
Reviewable
Authorized task
Summarize the internal service policy and include both the response deadline and the escalation contact.
Select a row to inspect its evidence.
Evidence inspector
Observed evidence
No escalation contact appears in the sample output, although the task explicitly requires one.
Finding interpretation
The requirement is marked violated and routed for human review.
Example authority path
Human authorized objective
Draft a partner update.
AI proposed action
Draft and send externally.
SIA finding
Sending exceeds the recorded authority.
Agent authority
As AI systems become more autonomous, the question is no longer only whether an answer is correct. It is whether the system is acting within the authority it was given. SIA helps enterprises maintain defined authority boundaries around AI workflows and creates reviewable evidence when an output, handoff, or proposed action may exceed them.
Capability does not automatically imply authority.
Conceptual governance path
Conceptual product illustration. The criteria behind these outcomes are not exposed.
What SIA provides
Evidence that AI output remains associated with the applicable objective and governing requirements.
Visibility into whether AI outputs, handoffs, or proposed actions remain within defined authority boundaries.
Governance findings can support release, correction, restriction, review, or withholding according to the deployed control environment.
Reviewable governance evidence for individual AI interactions and workflows.
Patent Pending · Proprietary Technology
SIA is patent pending. Certain implementation methods, semantic processing techniques, governance logic, measurement methods, and control mechanisms are proprietary to AI Align Lab and are intentionally not disclosed in this product preview.
Your workflow
Start with one bounded workflow and one measurable question.