Skip to content
SIA

Product preview

One SIA layer for every way you use AI.

SIA governs prompts, reduces unnecessary token use, and monitors outcome quality. It also preserves Agent Authority and creates reviewable evidence through each interface.

One interaction. Complete decision trace.

Managed prompt

Checked outcome

Authority

Control begins before the model call and continues through the outcome.

SIA keeps prompt context, quality findings, authority, and evidence visible.

Without SIA / With SIA

The same prompt, governed and ungoverned.

Three authored examples that illustrate the pattern. Figures shown for each example are illustrative, not measured benchmark results.

Choose an example to compare

These are authored examples that illustrate the pattern: a governed answer that is shorter while still covering the task’s requirements. They are not recorded benchmark results, and the figures shown for each example are illustrative. Aggregate benchmark numbers appear in the estimator below.

Software engineering · Coding

The same fix in a quarter of the words, with the standard cited.

The prompt, as sent

Fix the CSV parsing bug in the attached parse_row function: quoted fields that contain a comma are split into the wrong number of columns. Return the minimal corrected code, explain the cause in a sentence or two, and confirm the quoted-comma case now parses correctly. Use only the attached source.

Tokens on this call

−23.3%

600 → 460

Cost of this call

−46.0%

generation model only

Quality (illustrative)

80 → 90

+10 points

What the prompt demanded

5 of 5

ungoverned met 3 · +2

Without SIA

320 output tokens

The problem is that the current parse_row function uses line.split(","), which treats every comma as a field separator. When a value is wrapped in quotes and itself contains a comma, for example "Smith, Ana", the function incorrectly breaks it into two fields. This is a classic CSV parsing mistake. To fix it properly, you should stop splitting the string by hand and use Python's built-in csv module, which already implements the CSV format rules for you, including quoted fields: ```python import csv from io import StringIO def parse_row(line): reader = csv.reader(StringIO(line)) return next(reader) ``` Explanation: - Cause: split(",") has no concept of quoting, so any comma inside a quoted value is treated as a delimiter. - Fix: csv.reader understands quoting and returns the fields exactly as intended. - Why it works: wrapping the line in StringIO lets csv.reader read it like a small file, so "Smith, Ana" is kept as a single field. This is the smallest change that resolves the issue while keeping the function's signature and behavior for ordinary rows unchanged.

With SIA

110 output tokens · same prompt, governed

```python def parse_row(line): import csv from io import StringIO return next(csv.reader(StringIO(line))) ``` Cause: `split(",")` has no concept of quoting, so a comma inside a quoted value is treated as a field separator (violates RFC 4180 §2.6). Check: `parse_row('42,"Smith, Ana",active')` now returns `["42", "Smith, Ana", "active"]`, so the quoted-comma case parses correctly.

What the shorter answer still had to carry

The governed answer is shorter, yet it still covers every requirement the task called for. Representative requirements are shown below.

5 of 5 covered
  • corrected code
  • cause explanation
  • edge case check
  • + 2 additional requirements preserved

What the token reduction is worth at your volume

Built from the SIA-500 benchmark suite, not from the illustrative examples above. Choose an assumed reduction and this applies it to public list prices and the volume you set. The default is deliberately conservative.

Model

Calls per month

Assumed output-token reduction

GPT-4o today · per year

$1,110

With SIA · per year

$999.00

Difference

$111.00

How this is worked out. A 10% output-token reduction (conservative assumption), applied to a call of 900 tokens in and 700 out, priced at OpenAI’s published rates of $2.50 and $10.00 per million tokens (as at 2026-05-25).

SIA-500 token results. Median output-token reduction: 8.9%. Arithmetic mean (per-prompt): approximately 30%. The gap between median and mean reflects task-to-task variation, so results should be read as a distribution rather than a guaranteed per-request reduction.

Illustrative estimate only. Actual results vary by task, model, workload, and deployment configuration. It assumes cost falls in proportion to tokens, covers the OpenAI model only, and does not represent total deployment cost or net SIA processing overhead.

These are our prompts. Yours are the ones that matter.

A pilot runs the same comparison on twenty of your own prompts and returns the findings, the measured token difference, and a record you can take to your own review.

Request a pilot

Choose your interface

The full SIA capability layer, wherever work happens.

These are different ways to use SIA, not separate capability packages. Each interface provides access to the same SIA platform.

In development

For individual users

SIA Workspace

A conversational interface for people who want a familiar AI experience with SIA built into every interaction.

Planned

For existing AI tools

Browser and Desktop Extension

Prompt guidance and SIA controls inside the interfaces employees already use.

Available for pilot

For applications and developers

API and Gateway

The same SIA functions available through programmed integrations, enterprise applications, and agent workflows.

One semantic alignment platform

Every interface is designed to provide access to the same SIA capabilities as it becomes available.

Prompt management
Token efficiency
Semantic alignment
Outcome quality
Agent Authority
Governance evidence

Guided evidence workspace

Follow the prompt, outcome, authority, and evidence.

This illustrative preview uses synthetic data. No prompt is evaluated and no external action is executed.

What the user sees

A familiar prompt and response.

1. Prompt sent

The person works in the interface they already use.

2. Response returned

When checks pass, the workflow is not interrupted.

What SIA records independently

A governance record for every interaction.

Authority and policy findings
Token use and estimated savings
Outcome quality checks
Evidence and review status
Interactive demo Click through the workspace below

SIA Evidence Workspace

Choose a scenario, select a finding, and open the Review and Report views to see the complete governance record.

1. Choose2. Inspect3. Report
SIA evidence workspace
Synthetic demo
Output finding·TX 4821

Service policy summary

Customer policy summary

Governance record created
Human review available
1Start with the task and its authority boundary.

Objective

Human task

Prompt management

Context refined

AI result

Observed

Outcome and authority check

Quality and authority

Human decision

Reviewable

Authorized task

Summarize the internal service policy and include both the response deadline and the escalation contact.

Prompt context managedIllustrative token estimate 44 → 31Authority scope recorded

Recorded requirements

Select a row to inspect its evidence.

3 total

Evidence inspector

Escalation contact included

Violated

Observed evidence

No escalation contact appears in the sample output, although the task explicitly requires one.

Finding interpretation

The requirement is marked violated and routed for human review.

Service policy · section 4.3 Original finding preserved

Example authority path

Human authorized objective

Draft a partner update.

01

AI proposed action

Draft and send externally.

02

SIA finding

Sending exceeds the recorded authority.

03
Human review required

Agent authority

Govern AI authority, not just AI output.

As AI systems become more autonomous, the question is no longer only whether an answer is correct. It is whether the system is acting within the authority it was given. SIA helps enterprises maintain defined authority boundaries around AI workflows and creates reviewable evidence when an output, handoff, or proposed action may exceed them.

Capability does not automatically imply authority.

Conceptual governance path

Authorized objectiveAI model / agentGovernance checkProceed · Restrict · Review · Withhold

Conceptual product illustration. The criteria behind these outcomes are not exposed.

What SIA provides

Evidence of governance, not another model.

Alignment evidence

Evidence that AI output remains associated with the applicable objective and governing requirements.

Authority governance

Visibility into whether AI outputs, handoffs, or proposed actions remain within defined authority boundaries.

Applied control

Governance findings can support release, correction, restriction, review, or withholding according to the deployed control environment.

Auditability

Reviewable governance evidence for individual AI interactions and workflows.

Patent Pending · Proprietary Technology

SIA is patent pending. Certain implementation methods, semantic processing techniques, governance logic, measurement methods, and control mechanisms are proprietary to AI Align Lab and are intentionally not disclosed in this product preview.

Your workflow

Where could SIA improve cost, quality, or control?

Start with one bounded workflow and one measurable question.

Request a pilot